|
I am having to rethink an old habit and realizing times change, perhaps
I should, too?
Very commendable if you ask me.
If I could start over, I'd have one source PF for each object type, so
FILSRC
PGMSRC
SRVPGMSRC
PROTOSRC
BNDSRC
... you get the idea.
The basic concept is that since IBM i doesn't allow two programs in a
library to have the same name (not even CLP and RPG), or two files
(not even DSPF and PF), I need separate source files for these object
types as long as I want to have the source member named the same as
the object.
Something to ponder; I don't really know the bestie best way to use
the IFS yet. But it fits right in to your very useful thread.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.