|
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Bob P. Roche
<BRoche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You can compare them, The system just needs to
understand what is > or <.
Please understand my context. I was refuting the idea that "empty"
and "not empty" are the only tests that make sense for empty strings,
when empty strings are distinct from null.
According to Charles Wilt, even when empty strings are distinct from
null, it doesn't make sense to allow less-than or greater-than
comparisons between empty strings and other values.
John Y.
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.