AW: perfm of Date\Time\Timestamp

["Birgitta Hauser" <Hauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Barbara,

does this new keyword suppress errors that occur for invalid date ranges
when using different date formats?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

Birgitta Hauser

"Shoot for the moon, even if you miss, you'll land among the stars." (Les
Brown)
"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance." (Derek Bok)
"What is worse than training your staff and losing them? Not training them
and keeping them!"

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Barbara Morris
Gesendet: Saturday, 16. July 2011 01:15
An: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: perfm of Date\Time\Timestamp

On 2011/7/13 5:25 PM, CRPence wrote:
> FWiW in a recent [but unrelated] search for a compiler PTF I noticed a
> new option to turn off date [, time, and timestamp] validation which
> could give even further improvement for certain processing [according to
> statements in the APAR-text\PTF-cover-letter] where doing so might be
> justified while also being a trusted effect:
>
> APAR SE46814 gives VALIDATE(*NODATETIME); note limitation on *USA:
http://www-912.ibm.com/n_dir/nas4apar.NSF/c79815e083182fec862564c00079d117/3
1a8843c41bb1b1e8625784900421ef3?OpenDocument
>

See my post about this new keyword in the RPG Cafe blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/b542d3ac-0785-4b6f
-8e53-f72051460822

I had earlier posted an entry in the Cafe wiki about this keyword (see 
the link in the blog post), but that has pretty much the same 
information as you can see in the PTF cover-letter.