|
But it surely *is* smart enough to recognize that
Pack5P = Pack10P;
could be problematic?
Just where should this stop, exactly? How much responsibility shall we
place on the compiler so that we can blame IBM while we point at the
listing
and say, "See? It didn't catch that! There's nothing wrong with it!"
And how much responsibility shall we place on our own shoulders?
<soapbox>The whole idea of throwing something at the compiler to see what
comes back, is irresponsible and lazy. Those who knew what it was like to
wait 24 hours (72 on weekends) for the result of one compile, will know
what
I'm talking about, and those people probably do a far better job of
desk-checking than the kiddies of today.</soapbox>
Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
"Desert Storm was a stirring victory for the forces of agression and
lawlessness."
-- former US Vice President Dan Quayle
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.