× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. December 2009

Numeric value defined as 63 digits actually greater than 63 digits?

Folks:

This probably has an obvious answer ... but I'm only on my first cup of coffee ... so you'll have to take it easy on me.

I've got a field defined in a qualified data structure that's 63 digits with 0 decimal positions ... but when I compile it, I get the following error:

447 D sequenceValue DS qualified
448 D exists N
449 D start 63 0
450
*RNF0503 20 449 000142 Length of numeric item START is greater than 63 digits;
defaults to 63.

I'm sure I'm missing something obvious ... but what is it?

Thanks!

david


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.