Re: Numeric value defined as 63 digits actually greater than 63 digits? -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

What target release level are you compiling at?

--------------------------------------------------
From: "David Gibbs" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 11:00 AM
To: "RPG programming on the IBM i / System i" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Numeric value defined as 63 digits actually greater than 63 digits?

On 12/7/2009 9:56 AM, Luis Rodriguez wrote:

Is it possible that it is looking at the field as packed (so the real field
has a digit more) ?

Thought about that too ... I set the field type to "S" so it couldn't be defined as packed, but got the same error.

david

--
IBM i on Power Systems - For when you can't afford to be out of business
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.