Re: Numeric value defined as 63 digits actually greater than 63 digits?

Folks:

This probably has an obvious answer ... but I'm only on my first cup of
coffee ... so you'll have to take it easy on me.

I've got a field defined in a qualified data structure that's 63 digits
with 0 decimal positions ... but when I compile it, I get the following
error:

447 D sequenceValue DS qualified
448 D exists N
449 D start 63 0
450
*RNF0503 20 449 000142 Length of numeric item START is greater than 63
digits;
defaults to 63.

I'm sure I'm missing something obvious ... but what is it?

Thanks!

david

--
IBM i on Power Systems - For when you can't afford to be out of business
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.