|
Man...I would have thought this would have been caught before...I must be
doing something wrong.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:35 AM, <J.Beckeringh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
OK, I see what you mean. I get the same result (V6R1):
When I put the substring in a 1A field %bitand results in x'00010000'.
When I put the field in a datastructure and overlay it with a 3U 0 field,
it still goes wrong when I do the %bitand on the character field, but
%bitand on the integer correctly gives x'00000000'.
Looks like a bug to me.
Joep Beckeringh
rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 22-06-2009 14:55:34:
Michael Ryan(which I
Argh....I said that wrong. I'm comparing the result of the %BitAnd
would think would be x'00000000') to x'10000000', so I would expect that--
comparison to be false, and follow the 'no' path. But it doesn't...it
follows the 'yes' path.
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
