×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Barbara,

Along the same lines, is there any reason that limits file processing hasn't been expanded to use externally described file fields?

-mark


At 4/24/09 01:54 PM, you wrote:
Douglas Handy wrote:
>
> Well, couldn't that just have been handled the same way you rename a field
> from an external format, even under RPG III?
>
> In my experience with look-ahead fields in the 70's, you typically only
> cared about a few fields at most and only list them under the ** I-spec, not
> the whole record format. Why couldn't the field rename columns be used to
> supply the new name?
>

That's a good point.

I can't guess at any other possible reasons for disallowing it. It's
possible that "they" had the same thinking as I just did.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.