|
Douglas Handy wrote:
>
> Well, couldn't that just have been handled the same way you rename a field
> from an external format, even under RPG III?
>
> In my experience with look-ahead fields in the 70's, you typically only
> cared about a few fields at most and only list them under the ** I-spec, not
> the whole record format. Why couldn't the field rename columns be used to
> supply the new name?
>
That's a good point.
I can't guess at any other possible reasons for disallowing it. It's
possible that "they" had the same thinking as I just did.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.