× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



If the READE returned %EOF and the CHAIN succeeded (%FOUND() = *ON)

Then in the first example, %eof(myFILE) would return *OFF; whereas in the second example, %eof() would
still be *ON.

I'm not saying it's a common occurrence, just saying that there is a difference in the behavior of
%eof() and %eof(myFile).

Charles Wilt
--
Software Engineer
CINTAS Corporation - IT 92B
513.701.1307

wiltc@xxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Lim Hock-Chai
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 10:33 AM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Cc: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Standards question: Whatisyour feeling
about%found&%eofvs.%found(file) & %eof(file) ?

I didn't know that either. I'm not sure why that would consider a
gotcha when using %eof() vs %eof(filename)?

Reade (myKey) myFile
Chain (myKey) myFile
If %eof(myFile) <== result of this testing would be wrong
Endif

Reade (myKey) myFile
Chain (myKey) myFile
If %eof() <== result of this testing would be wrong also
Endif



-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Shore

I did not know that. Thankfully I always qualify anyway.

<Charles Wilt>
One possible gotcha to using %eof() instead of %eof(filename) is that a
successful SETLL, SETGT, OPEN, or CHAIN will set %eof(filename) = *OFF.
But %eof() will be unchanged.

I always use %eof(filename).

HTH,
</Charles Wilt>
--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.




This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to be confidential and privileged. If you receive this e-mail and you are not a named addressee you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication without the consent of the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please delete and otherwise erase it and any attachments from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.