× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. July 2008

RE: Standards question: What isyour feeling about%found&%eofvs.%found(file) & %eof(file) ?

I didn't know that either. I'm not sure why that would consider a
gotcha when using %eof() vs %eof(filename)?

Reade (myKey) myFile
Chain (myKey) myFile
If %eof(myFile) <== result of this testing would be wrong
Endif

Reade (myKey) myFile
Chain (myKey) myFile
If %eof() <== result of this testing would be wrong also
Endif



-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Shore

I did not know that. Thankfully I always qualify anyway.

<Charles Wilt>
One possible gotcha to using %eof() instead of %eof(filename) is that a
successful SETLL, SETGT, OPEN, or CHAIN will set %eof(filename) = *OFF.
But %eof() will be unchanged.

I always use %eof(filename).

HTH,
</Charles Wilt>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.