× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



From: Walden H. Leverich

I could perform READE on the files and delete Records, but would
performance be better or worse if I ran the deletes via SQL

This is one of those cases where I don't even think Joe would
disagree... Deleting a "set" of records from a table based on key is
always going to be faster in SQL than in a loop with READE/DELETE.

I tend to agree, as long as the number of records is a certain number > 1.
I still don't think an SQL DELETE of a single record is as fast as a DELETE
by key.

Note that I don't use READE/DELETE in this situation, I use DELETE with a
key list.  It doesn't have to (AFAIK) read the data into the RPG buffers and
so is very fast.

The commitment control question is an interesting one, and at that point it
REALLY depends on a lot of factors such as workload and transaction size and
lots of other goodies.

Joe


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.