× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. March 2007

RE: Native Delete vs. SQL

I've to disagree and say that Rob's suggestion is likely to be the best.
Using CC is likely to make the process to run faster and will not leave
those deleted records in the file.  

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:51 AM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: RE: Native Delete vs. SQL 


As for Rob's question about commitment control... CC would be nice here,
but I don't think it's really needed. There is a simple, clean way to
remove unwanted rows, and I assume you don't need to hold the locks, so
it may make more sense to do it w/out CC and just delete the bad rows.

-Walden

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.