RE: Compiler directive

Tommy,

While this certainly a valid concern, would it be so difficult to provide 
both a backward compatible version *and* a useful version?  The only use I 
get out of the existing copybooks is to copy them into my own copy member, 
qualify the DS, and give the fields names that don't make my code next to 
illegible.

It might also be nice if the API documentation explicitly mentioned the 
file name of the corresponding copy member.


Tommy Holden wrote on 08/08/2006 03:36:09 PM:

Chances are this will not change anytime soon.  You have to remember
there are lots of folks who still aren't at a sufficient OS level to
support qualified DS.... 

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces+tommy.holden=hcahealthcare.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces+tommy.holden=hcahealthcare.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 

On

Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 2:33 PM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: Compiler directive

No, their technique is still the pits.  I would have preferred 

qualified 

data structures.

#####################################################################################
Attention:
The above message and/or attachment(s) is private and confidential and is 
intended 
only for the people for which it is addressed. If you are not named in the 
address 
fields, ignore the contents and delete all the material. Thank you. Have a nice 
day.

For more information on email virus scanning, security and content
management, please contact administrator@xxxxxxxxxxxx
#####################################################################################