RE: Compiler directive

Lots of folks?
I think the majority have long since moved to V5R1 which is where QUALIFIED were
introduced.

-Bob Cozzi
www.iSeriesTV.com
Ask your Manager to watch iSeriesTV.com


-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Holden Tommy
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 2:36 PM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: RE: Compiler directive

Chances are this will not change anytime soon.  You have to remember
there are lots of folks who still aren't at a sufficient OS level to
support qualified DS.... 


Thanks,
Tommy Holden


-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces+tommy.holden=hcahealthcare.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces+tommy.holden=hcahealthcare.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 2:33 PM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: Compiler directive

No, their technique is still the pits.  I would have preferred qualified

data structures.
      * CFGD0100 - QDCLCFGD - List Configuration Description - Basic 
Information
     D CFGD0100        DS                  Qualified
     D  Name                         10a         Name
     D  Category                     10a         Category
     D  APIFormat                     8a         API Format name
     D  CmdSuffix                     4a         Command Suffix

And whomever used the same format name(OBJL0100), with a totally
different 
layout, for List Objects (QUSLOBJ) and List object locks (QWCLOBJL)
should 
be horse dragged through a cactus field.

Rob Berendt