|
That is also my understanding of how most multi modules program work. I don't even know how one can call a non PEP module's main procedure. I suppose you could use CALLB to do that. However, that is not a very clean way of doing thing. -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Rich Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 4:33 PM To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Subject: RE: ILE and Access Paths This is totally different than how I've always worked. I always have one module that does *not* specify NOMAIN and all the rest of the modules used in a given program do specify NOMAIN. By specifying NOMAIN for a module the RPG cycle code is not generated AFAIK. At the very least specifying NOMAIN means that a PEP cannot be created for that module. I cannot for the life of me imagine a situation where a program would be created from multiple modules that do *not* specify NOMAIN, thereby allowing multiple PEP candidates (and multiple RPG cycles). AFAIK the RPG *does* "operate at the program level". Can you give an example of a program that uses multiple non-NOMAIN modules? James Rich
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.