|
The primary issue with "playing" is that the playthings often become one-off, key, fragile, temperamental components (not unlike an ill-mannered pet or relative) in a production system. "Playing" is fine, as long as it's kept outside of the production sandbox. "Evaluating" has a professorial ring to it and conveys a good message to management; it also means. Just because you can write a VARPG program doesn't mean you should stick it in the middle of your green-screen application. Sometimes evaluations show a new technique isn't that good, and that's when the code should be trashed. -rf > -----Original Message----- > From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Paris > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 9:03 PM > To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Service Programs VS normal Programs (Jon Paris) > > >> the truth of the matter is that, if it works, it may well not need to > be > touched. Ever. > > I _very_ clearly stated that I was in agreement with that position Joe. > If > _nothing_ ever changes then a rewrite is probably pointless. But I > cannot > agree with James - I have met hundreds of programmers who used the > "it ain't > broke" argument as an excuse for not doing/learning anything new. I > have > met very few who make changes just for the fun of it or to use the > latest > sexiest features. > > I do know that a very large percentage of 400 shops that I meet who > stick to > the "ain't broke" philosophy find themselves under constant threat from > Windows/Uni*x "solutions". Very few of "explorers" seem to be in that > position. > > Personally I think that there is a lot of benefit to "playing" (and I know > you do this Joe). As adults we seem to forget that all of the really > important things in our lives we learnt while playing as children. We > learnt to walk by falling over - think about it - walking is just a series > of controlled falls! Why does "play" become an evil because we are > adults? > If we use the latest and greatest - even if there is no immediate > quantifiable ROI - don't we get an ROI later when faced with new > programming > challenges? > > Jon Paris > Partner400 > www.Partner400.com > > > -- > This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing > list > To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l > or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.