RE: RPG IV release levels and complexity

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

Interesting point.

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 




"Bob cozzi" <cozzi@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces+rob=dekko.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
11/17/2003 05:04 PM
Please respond to
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries'" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: RPG IV release levels and complexity







>> Holding up compiler development just penalizes those who do upgrade.

I guess I just don't understand the rational for this line of thinking.
Is the presumption that it would now take IBM longer for Hans and Barbara 
&
Co. to do enhancements? Why's that?
You mean if they were working with a code base that could ship for V5R1 
and
later today, the current list of V5R3 enhancements would some how take
longer to finish? I thought those features were already finish but were 
now
being revisited since IBM is not shipping V5.3 until next year.  If the
compiler were release-independent, they could have shipped those cool new
features to all of us.
Tieing things to a version/release of OS/400 penalizes everyone, as well 
as
those who upgrade regularly because they too have to wait for the entire
release to ship before taking advantage of a new release of the compiler.
And Jon, aren't you still using Office 2000? After all, that is an old
product that is two releases old, isn't it?  :)

Bob Cozzi
Cozzi Consulting
www.rpgiv.com

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jon Paris
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 3:45 PM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: RPG IV release levels and complexity

 >> Most (all?) software for the Windows platform will run as far back as
Win98.  Microsoft releases runtime support for those older platforms 
because
they
know that a software vendor's Market Share depends on it.

And surely _this_ is what we should be asking IBM for Bob - that they PTF
back to out-of-service releases.  That really would have an impact. 
Holding
up compiler development just penalizes those who do upgrade.

Jon Paris
Partner400
www.Partner400.com


_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.