Re: Record name the same as the file name

["Beppe Costagliola" <beppecosta@xxxxxxxx>]

IBM says that SQL is strategic.
But forgets to allow it in /free, to accept v5r2, to recognize record
formats with same name and more . . .
Who knows .

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 3:52 PM
Subject: Record name the same as the file name


> I know that, with DDS, you always make the record format name different
> than the file name.
> I know that, with SQL, it defaults to making the record format name the
> same as the file name.  I further know there are tricks to renaming the
> record format name.  (These often involve naming the file what you want
> the record format name to be and then renaming the file after the fact.)
> I know that you can use a file level keyword to rename the record format
> name.
> However, why should we have to go through these tricks and shouldn't the
> compiler just be modified to get over it?
>
> Rob Berendt
> -- 
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> Benjamin Franklin
> _______________________________________________
> This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.