Re: SQLRPGLE with /FREE

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

I remember that also.  However, just because you put them into subroutines 
in order to go /free, doesn't preclude you from putting them in the 
physical order required by the precompiler.

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 





rick.baird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
08/18/2003 12:46 PM
Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
 
        To:     RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries 
<rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc: 
        Fax to: 
        Subject:        Re: SQLRPGLE with /FREE



on a related note, it's been a while since I've used imbedded sql.

I seem to remember that the precompiler had problems with the order in
which it encounters SQL statements - in other words, it needed to see
declare/open/fetch/close for instance in order within the source, or it
would puke.

is this still the case?

If not (or even if so), would putting all of your sql statements in
subroutines help the readability of mixing /free and +exec sql statements?
- have all of your sql calls near the end of your source, all grouped
together.

Rick
_______________________________________________

Just recently started coding in /FREE. Today, I'm writing in /FREE with
SQL. Looking at some of the archives it seems that this may not be a good
idea. What is the latest scoop on SQLRPGLE with /FREE?
_______________________________________________

Richard Baird
317-655-7318


_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.