RE: Copyrights (was Re: strsep sourc)

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

I think you're wrong.  Even if the use of "free" software does not make 
money for someone else, it still deprives them of their income.  Take the 
recent lawsuits being instituted against the roots of Linux.

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 





Colin Williams <colin.williams@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
06/13/2003 03:01 AM
Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
 
        To:     "'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries'" 
<rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc: 
        Fax to: 
        Subject:        RE: Copyrights (was Re: strsep sourc)


I would think that most copyright holders would not go to the effort of
taking action
Against anyone that infringed their copyright, unless the theif was 
actually
making money out
Out of what they had taken. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Qsrvbas [mailto:qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 13 June 2003 06:30
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Copyrights (was Re: strsep sourc)


rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>  10. Re: strsep sourc (Buck)
>
>Scott's comments about derivative works comes from the idea that you 
>can't copy pages from my copyrighted math textbook, publish it with a 
>new cover and call it your own.
>

What bothers me about all of this is the "standard practice" of using 
copyrighted programs that (nearly?) all of us have done... E.g., we see 
a copyrighted article in a trade magazine that provides an example 
template for "Work with..." functions and think nothing of using it more 
or less directly as the basis for every "Work with..." function we ever 
write. Downloadable code is usually available too, now that telecomm is 
everywhere.

Technically, that's a possible copyright violation and I challenge 
anybody to prove that a lawyer _couldn't_ convince a court of it. But 
it's common practice. It's been so common for so long that the entire 
concept of copying _published_ code for inclusion in applications calls 
into question the validity of enforcing copyrights once the code is 
widely published.

How is it possible to know when a copyright is "serious"? (I don't know 
a better word for this.)

Tom Liotta


_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, 
or
change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

For the latest on Bertram Books products and services and for 
up-to-the-minute book news visit www.bertrams.com


This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is 
confidential and privileged and is solely for the use of the intended 
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender 
and delete this e-mail and any attachments immediately






_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.