|
> From: Walden H. Leverich III > > I'm glad to see there are others that agree that recompiling to "move" to > production isn't a viable option. Let me get this straight... 1. You compile a program to a previous release (absolutely necessary for client support). 2. You move this program to another library, for whatever reason (promotion from unit test to QA, for example). 3. You can no longer debug the program. You must actually recompile the program whenever you move it to a new library. Is this what I'm hearing? What is the rationale behind this behavior? WHat is actually occurring on the machine that causes it to "lose" its debug information? Reading between the lines, I get the idea that that this doesn't occur for programs compiled on the current release. Correct? If so, why is this action selective? Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.