|
As an IT manager, am I to only hire programmers that have proficiency in all 7-9 different languages that we need to do things "right" in your opinion? Or am I to spend time & money training them in all of these technologies?
In either case, it results in higher costs to my company, either in salary or in training/time or both. It also results in a difficult environment to manage.
Sure, in a huge corporation like IBM it makes perfect sense to have different people working in different languages. Then, just send the project to the place where it is most appropriate.
But, in a smaller company, such as mine, where we've got 3 people in the IT department, it's completely unrealistic to think that we're going to support doing every project in a different language just because you think it might save us a few hours of coding.
We already work in RPG, C, CL, DDS, VB, and Bourne Shell. We don't need to add other languages to that list of requirements!
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.