× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Monday 03 March 2003 8:45 pm, Feador, Jerry wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>       Does anybody have a clue as to how I can prevent a recursive call
> from a command?
[snip]
>       Any ideas on how I can get the first CL(1) to end if the command is
> already in effect (or running, or whatever)?

Hi Jerry

The way I've tackled this where I don't want a second instance of the 
program (whether it allows it or not) is to send a message to that 
program in the stack. If it fails, the program isn't there, so can be 
run, otherwise you don't call it. I wrapped it in a small CL program and 
just call it with the program name I want to check. Code is at 
http://www.dbg400.net/download/checkpgm.txt I swapped the message it 
sends from an in-house one to an IBM one that is more appropriate ;)

Regards, Martin
-- 
martin@xxxxxxxxxx  AIM/Gaim: DBG400dotNet  http://www.dbg400.net   /"\
DBG/400 - DataBase Generation utilities - AS/400 / iSeries Open    \ /
Source free test environment tools and others (file/spool/misc)     X
Debian GNU/Linux | ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML mail & news  / \


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.