× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. August 2002

RE: Error in the EVAL Statement? (when + is used more than once)

"I think it's taking the second + as a sign."

That may be the reason Jim.  I also tried the * and it is a error. I think this
clarifies my doubt on this matter.
However, I tried this now:

c                   z-add     502.34        amount1           7 2
c                   z-add     0             amount2           7 2

c                   eval      amount2 = amount1 + + 7
c                             500.00

c                   seton

You know the result? 8002.34

How?
Peter Vidal
PALL Aeropower Corp.
Senior Programmer Analyst

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.