|
Why ask IBM to modify the tools we insist in using, instead of using the existing tools best suited for each job? Switching to REXX will meet oposition, as any change will. Also using the new CL features, if IBM implements them, will meet the same oposition. ____________________________________________________________________ Rick Klopfer wrote: > -- > Simon: I concur with Jeff. We were asked to submit suggestions to improve >the existing software and from I have been reading, I would find many of them >quite useful. To suggest using REXX at my shop would meet with opposition. >While a few developers would probably like to learn REXX, sadly many would >not. Support of REXX applications would become an issue. > > Now...getting off the soapbox so someone else can jump on! > > Cheers! > > Rick Klopfer, CCP CSP <SNIP>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.