|
I've been bitten by this too. The last application I was working on never used the MOVEA op code so never ran across this. JBA, on the other hand, does use this and it took me a while to figure out where this indicator was being changed. Can you guess that I advocate MOVEA's usage for indicators? Regards, Jim Langston -----Original Message----- From: Buck Calabro [mailto:Buck.Calabro@commsoft.net] Advocates of scanning the RPG source for indicator usage will be in for a very unpleasant shock if indicator 89 is set/reset in another display file format or if the code contains gems like movea '11111' *in(85). Been there. Got the third degree burns. Never again. The compiler cross reference will show indicators 85,86,87,88 and 89 as being used in the above scenario, but NOT here:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
