|
Richard, Unfortunately, most programming knowledge I've found comes from doing. You can read all the books you want, but until you actually write it you have no clue, that's what I've found anyway. The same is with ILE. I read up on ILE quite a bit and had a foggy notion of what it did, then I went and created a service program, binding directory, service file (?), used calls in an RPG ILE program, *then* I understood it. Then when I read about it I have more of a foundation to understand what people are talking about. Activation groups are a bit the same way. You can read all you want, but until you start using them and seeing how they act and such, it's just a foggy notion. I've pretty much come to the conclusion in AGs, that if your performance is fine, leave stuff in the Default activation group if you can, if you are having performance issues, use a *NEW or *NAMED activation group, and everything that activation group calls use *CALLER activation group. This is just my conclusion, however, and since I haven't tried it, can't say for sure. Again, fuzzy book knowledge, not experience knowledge. Not enough people are using named activaction groups to give you any tips from experience, I don't think, as most people don't need to. How long would it take you to try it using the *default activation group versus a *NEW or *NAMED activation group and testing response time? I can guess that *NEW and *CALLER will speed up your performance, but don't know enough from real world experience to tell you for sure. In another year or so more people would have had a need to use activation groups to have more knowledge to share. Regards, Jim Langston -----Original Message----- From: Richard B Baird [mailto:rbaird@esourceconsulting.com] Simon, <SNIP> I posted a question here and in the web400 list earlier this week. It described a CGI environment and asked for guidance on activation groups. <SNIP> And I have yet to hear even an opinion on how to handle my specific circumstances. The only thing I'm sure of, is that I have the potential to have a complete performance dog, and only guesses as to what would make it better. And, I feel, only about 1% of anybody listening to me now, could even hazzard to guess which way would be best.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.