|
M, The intent with GPL licensing is to encourage others to share. I have worked with a lot of open source software and the consultants that support that software are all doing quite well. For example, on a recent project that used an Apache project called Struts, every time we needed a new feature, someone had already contributed one. Why would I want to pay for a product that evolves more slowly? >From www.opensource.org: "The basic idea behind open source is simple: When programmers can read, redistribute, and modify the source code for a piece of software, the software evolves. People improve it, people adapt it, people fix bugs. And this can happen at a speed that, if one is used to the slow pace of conventional software development, seems astonishing." Here are some links to a much more comprehensive description: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=778&group_id=1 David Morris >>> MNWills@taylorcorp.com 02/28/02 02:54PM >>> Not to question the judgment on the licensing, but wouldn't it be better to go under another license for those people who would like to use the toolkit in their programs that are to be sold?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.