× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. December 2001

RE: Renaming Fields in the D specs: why?

But you realize, this means war.  <g>

I learned RPG in a shop with a no cycle, no left hand indicator standard.
My previous training in other languages included handling control breaks.
Seems to me that the general logical problem of identifying the control
break condition is equally difficult regardless of which tool you use.

I realize I'm clinging to my ignorance here.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Daly [mailto:Tdaly@sddsystems.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:48 AM
> To: 'rpg400-l@midrange.com'
> Subject: RE: Renaming Fields in the D specs: why?
>
>
> A bit off subject maybe....
>
> I'm curious as to how many people would code their own
> control breaks versus
> use the cycle.
>
> I'd use the cycle, myself.  It's just a feature of the
> language and is very
> reliable.
>
>
> Tom
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.