RE: Renaming Fields in the D specs: why?

[Tom Daly <Tdaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

A bit off subject maybe....

I'm curious as to how many people would code their own control breaks versus
use the cycle.

I'd use the cycle, myself.  It's just a feature of the language and is very
reliable.


Tom

 |  -----Original Message-----
 |  From: Reeve Fritchman [mailto:reeve@ltl400.com]
 |  Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:10
 |  To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
 |  Subject: Renaming Fields in the D specs: why?
 |
 |
 |  Troy, I've been following this thread with some interest
 |  and I'd like to
 |  push your gray cells around a bit.
 |
 |  There isn't any other mechanism for selectively changing
 |  input field names.
 |  I-specs aren't going away as long as there is one person on
 |  the planet using
 |  RPG cycle control breaks (and I'll get flamed if I make a
 |  joke about the
 |  last person still using matching record, so I won't).  I'm
 |  not sure it's


 |  _______________________________________________
 |  This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
 |  (RPG400-L) mailing list
 |  To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
 |  To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
 |  visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
 |  or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
 |  Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
 |  at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
 |