RE: Conditionaql compilation problem VS SQL -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Conditionaql compilation problem VS SQL
From: Buck Calabro <Buck.Calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 14:34:23 -0500
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

>Some D spec are already there. It look like the SDL D spec get
>inserted just before the first non D spec

Of course!  I'm an idiot.  Sorry, Denis.  Try putting a blank C spec in
there to fool the precompiler.  If that doesn't fit with your program you
might need another spec - maybe a P?  I gave up working with that
precompiler a while ago.  It is easier to put all of the SQL in a separate
service program than to try to work around the problems with mixing SQL and
application code.
  --buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.