× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Rob,

So, I'd guess you don't care much for OPNQRYF? <g>  What's "All the more
reason to avoid OPNQRYF"?  That this is a report request?  Or that QMQRY
s*cks?  ?????

Never quite learned OPNQRYF?  Too bad.  Sounds like you've been burned pretty
bad by it.  Just like any other tool, once you know how to use it, it's a
great thing to have in your toolbox.  It took me about three weeks to learn to
use about 80% of it's capabilities.

I have used SQL; it's a great tool.  You love it.  You never touch OPNQRYF.
Fine.  If you've already got SQL, or can make a business case for buying it,
great.  Use the right tool for the job.

But the same can be said for OPNQRYF.  Personally speaking, my OPNQRYF code is
extrememly readable and versatile; I always format the source code so that
QRYSLT tests line up, as well as other parameters'.  I do not hesitate to say
that my OPNQRYF code is very maintainable.

If I can make a business case for buying SQL, I'm sure my company would spring
for it.  Otherwise, your other comments ring hollow with sarcasm.

Why use a diamond-studded gold hammer to drive nails when a standard steel one
will do?  (Unless you're the military. <g>)

<twitch, twitch, as I hesitate to fire this off, triggering another religious
war - YOU started it, Rob! <g> >

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952

-------------------------- Original Message --------------------------

All the more reason to avoid OPNQRYF.  There is no ease of maintenance.
Instead use SQL.  People who stick with OPNQRYF belong to one of few
categories.
1)  Work for cheap company which refuses to buy SQL.
2)  Create vendor software with mandate not to force customers to purchase
SQL.  (When they've already had to purchase 400, rpg compiler, etc.)
3)  Have no s*e*x life and last conquest was figuring out OPNQRYF.
4)  Love to use primary files and can do that if they use OPNQRYF instead
of SQL.


Rob Berendt

==================
Remember the Cole!



>But the report does not use the formatting that was
>set up in Query/400.  Is it possible to use that
>formatting?

Unfortunately, AFAIK, no.

>If not, is there an easy way to make a
>QMFORM for the QMQRY?

Easy?!?!?  No!  QMQRY, IMNSHO, is a piece of cr*p as far as being able to
make
decent-looking reports.  The only way I would not just do all this using
OPNQRYF / RPG would be if there was already a query out there, and the
user/boss wanted the absolute quickest & dirtiest way to get it done *AND*
understood that the report isn't gonna look all that great.

You gotta look at this from a maintenance perspective, too.  Even if you
are
able to muddle your way through this, is somebody down the line going to
have
to maintain it?  Are they going to look at the cryptic source and wonder
what
the h*ll possessed you to do this?

If you want a quick way to do nice-looking reports quickly using RPG and
hate
using IBM's RLU (Report Layout Utility), get a copy of RDA (Report Design
Aid)
- it looks and feels just like SDA and it's a heckuva lot easier to use
than
RLU.  You'll be cranking out good-looking reports in no time.

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952

-------------------------- Original Message --------------------------

> Click the link below
>
http://as400service.rochester.ibm.com/s_dir/slkbase.NSF/$searchform?Open&vie

w=w
> all
> In the search field write :
>
> Passing Parameters to a Query/400 Query
>
> The basic idea of the solution is in the select statement to write in the
> Select part:
>
> DATE      GE   :FROMDAT
>
> // Yes the : has to be there
>
> Save the query as normal i.e. a QRYDFN object.
>
> Run the Query with STRQMQRY and ALWQRYDFN(*YES) and set the variables in
> SETVAR
>
> I.e. in the above case:
>
> StrQmQry QmQRy(yourlib/yourqry) AlwQryDfn(*YES)
>      QmForm(*QMQRY) SetVar((FROMDAT 19991122))

This is a great tip!  But the report does not use the formatting that was
set
 up
in Query/400.  Is it possible to use that formatting?  If not, is there an
 easy
way to make a QMFORM for the QMQRY?

Or is the answer RTFM?  ;-)
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.