Re: RPG/400 pgm strange behavior

[Mark Holliday <mholliday@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Richard Jackson wrote:
> Using a command interface to solve this problem
> is pointless and a gigantic waste of
> CPU and human cycles.

Scott Klement wrote:
>You shouldn't have this problem calling from a CL program to another CL
>program.   However, if you do a SBMJOB from a CL program to call another
>CL program, you'll run into this error again.  Maybe thats what you're
>thinking of?

You're right on the money, Scott.  A co-worker and I wrote an email utility
that sits on the MSF and
monitors for incoming messages.  Obviously the pgm's run in batch.  Thanks
for pointing out the 
difference.  I would guess that Richard is referring to interactive jobs and
that he's well aware of the 
batch vs. interactive issue.

Mark
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---