RE: RPG/400 pgm strange behavior

["Richard Jackson" <richardjackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes.  Exactly.  We agree.

Richard Jackson
mailto:richardjackson@richardjackson.net
www.richardjacksonltd.com
Voice: 1 (303) 808-8058
Fax:   1 (303) 663-4325

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Mark Holliday
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 11:46 AM
To: 'RPG400-L@midrange.com'
Subject: Re: RPG/400 pgm strange behavior


Richard Jackson wrote:
> Using a command interface to solve this problem
> is pointless and a gigantic waste of
> CPU and human cycles.

Scott Klement wrote:
>You shouldn't have this problem calling from a CL program to another CL
>program.   However, if you do a SBMJOB from a CL program to call another
>CL program, you'll run into this error again.  Maybe thats what you're
>thinking of?

You're right on the money, Scott.  A co-worker and I wrote an email utility
that sits on the MSF and
monitors for incoming messages.  Obviously the pgm's run in batch.  Thanks
for pointing out the
difference.  I would guess that Richard is referring to interactive jobs and
that he's well aware of the
batch vs. interactive issue.

Mark
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---