|
It would be the "uneasy feeling that you've been had" if I had bought into it.....sometimes there is value in being a great procrastinator or being so snowed under you just don't have time to get into every new fad. The major problem I see with JAVA is not the language itself, it's the same problem I see with any object oriented language or anything that uses ActiveX components or even ILE Service Programs. It's that you are entirely dependent on your library of "Parts" and how well you understand their useage and how well you can communicate that understanding to other programmers. At my last company, I built service programs containing probably more than 300 procedures, which were heavily used in many application programs. However, no one else there is familiar with all those procedures, so I don't know how all those programs will be maintained by the poor RPG programmer who comes in cold. While some are generic little day-of-the-week routines that won't be hard to figure out, many are very big, very technical, very specific to the application at hand and not at all the kind of thing that is transferable to any other company. Hence, no matter how talented the maintenance programmer is, he's gonna be lost when he sees some of them, especially if he like 90% of RPG'ers know nothing about ILE. If I spend years developing wonderful JAVA objects that do everything under the Sun ( pun intended ), and then I transfer to your shop where you have developed an entirely different set of objects that I know absolutely nothing about, haven't I just been reduced to a wimpering novice again? The language may be transferable, but the knowledge base is not. I'm not complaining, I love all the new features of ILE and use them heavily. I just haven't figured out how to handle this training situation with just ILE procedures yet, much less real objects. The 30 or 40 BIF's that IBM has given us is hard enough to get everyone trained on without even looking at all the home-grown ones that I build. And even if I did get everyone trained on them, they would not be available at their next shop. How does everyone else address this issue? ----- Original Message ----- From: "L. S. Russell" <leslier@datrek.com> To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 2:06 PM Subject: Re: Modernising the AS/400 > > Nothing factual here, of course, just that uneazy feeling that we've been > > here before. > > Don't you mean the uneasy feeling that you've been had. Had by > consultants, and early adopting pundits. Had by gurus with no real world > experience. > Pushed face first over a barrel and had. > > -- > L. S. Russell > THE PEOPLES PROGRAMMER > -- > +--- > | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- > +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.