|
Brad wrote: >Gimme a break, Hans. That's not was deja is for. It's like asking a >ferrari to go four-wheeling in the mud. > >Sure it helps to know what usenet is all about when searching, but even if >you don't you'll find your answers, if they are there. 99% of the time they >are, and not just AS/400 stuff either. I have plenty of examples. One >including a problem with a DVD movie that wouldn't show theatrical trailers. >I got on deja and within 1 minute I had the answer (actually 20 or more) of >why I was getting a "parental lock" message when trying to view theatrical >trailers. > >Let me tell you, typing in a search phrase and clicking "find" is the same >thing google does. No different. And it's real discussions. Usenet (and >this list) are more valuable because they are real world stuff. > >Google and deja both have their means. They're both good at what they do. > >It the only faults you can find with something are things that it is not >meant to do, then let's just drop this thread. Brad: As usual, I think we're both arguing from different points of view. I know from my own personal experience that the vast majority of human visitors to my own personal web pages arrive via a web search tool like Google. You're right that I shouldn't presume to know how you run your web pages. After all, the only people who read your web logs are you and your ISP. (I must confess to being a bit of a hypocrite, though. Although I enjoy seeing how people arrive at my web pages by reading the HTTP_REFERER data, at home I browse using the IJB proxy which filters out the HTTP_REFERER from my http requests!) Furthermore, the logistics of personal web pages are very different than commercial pages. Although my dial-up ISP offers very generous terms for personal pages, if my pages get too popular, I may be charged more for the extra traffic. As a result, I want to make sure the surfer has ways to exit out into other related information. On the other hand, commercial pages often want to generate more traffic within their own pages, and so often tend to ignore any outside (potentially competitor) links. One more point: Although you prefer searching Usenet and consider it to be most useful, please don't assume that others share your opinion too. Personally, I find Usenet too much of a zoo. I know I'm not the only one who regularly uses web search tools, like Google or FAST. (My original argument is that links to other related web pages helps greatly those who use web search tools, not that one search technique is better than another.) That brings up one (hopefully) final point: Perhaps we should change the name of RPG. Entering RPG into any search tool (web or Usenet) gets you lots of sites, but most have absolutely nothing to do with the midrange programming language. Cheers! Hans Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.