× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 16:04, Jeff Crosby <jlcrosby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Initially, we priced out 2 physical servers to spread the load of 5 virtual
servers and for redundancy. ÂIf one of the physical servers would have a
problem, the other could handle all 5 for a spell. ÂNow we're in the "let's
get the costs down" phase. ÂIf we go with 1 physical server, we could keep
the old servers as backups instead of buying a second physical server.

This stuff is usually not as simple and flawless as one might think it
is. A High Availability environment requires on-site personnel with
the appropriate expertise - with external expertise, a HA environment
makes little sense, unless you also have appropriate SLAs with the
external expertise.

Be aware of application support when using virtualization and think
about the consequences when virtualization critical base
infrastructure like domain controllers.

1) Receive orders from customer and salesreps, forward to System i for
processing, receive results from System i, and transmit same to customers
and salesreps (mission critical).

What does mission critical mean? How much downtime is acceptable? How
fast do you expect recovery when your server room burns down? How much
when the server burns? Or, what kind of SLA do you have to satisfy
with this infrastructure?

5) Exchange (unless we go with Google Apps).

Where are your domain controllers? For redundancy, you need at least
two. Remember many special considerations when implementing
virtualized domain controllers.

As a baseline, for your needs (ignoring SLA/redundancy) you need at
least three machines - an SBS 2008, a terminal server and a server for
your LOB app. I would not bring redundancy or a SAN into this mix: The
easier a setup is, the easier it is to fix.

The cost difference between a SAN and non-SAN setup for this is $1,619.
Still think a SAN is overkill?

What kind of SAN? I seriously doubt that, because IBM charges about
10kUS$ - 15kUS$ for their entry SANs. Without any disks.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.