|
Rick, Any information/advice on the above questions or anything I haven't
thought about would be greatly appreciated.
Depending on where you live, you may want to go the wireless route instead of the underground cable suggested by some in the thread. I live in FL, and am told that running network CAT5 underground between buildings is like putting up a sign for lightning strikes which says "Kick Me". Using fiber optic converters on each end eliminates that, but they are spendy. And you can use network surge suppressors on each end, but I don't think that is as safe as just using wireless. If you live in a locale where lightening is not as prevelant, you may be fine for a long time without doing anything special for protection with an underground cable. I've just been told to avoid it where I live. For that distance, I'd suggest using a high gain directional antenna on the side with the access point. Another option is to drop in a standalone access point in repeater mode just insde the closest wall of the second building. In repeater mode you just need power to the AP, and it receives the signal from the sending AP then re-broadcasts it. This should increase the coverage inside the second building as you have already gone the first distance and brick walls, leaving only the interior of the second building. Or do both, if necessary. Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.