|
The fact that so little use is made of what we already had _before_ thisOSS stuff came along should have been a hint to IBM.
"OpenSource" <opensource-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 07/15/2016
03:43:01 PM:
From: Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><snip>
To: IBMi Open Source Roundtable <opensource@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 07/15/2016 03:43 PM
Subject: Re: [IBMiOSS] gmake: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop.
Sent by: "OpenSource" <opensource-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
The point I’m trying to make is that you can’t explain jargon with
more jargon. It has to be stated in the terms your target user is
already familiar with. If learning all this stuff was easy for us
old farts a lot more people would be grepping all over the place in
the IFS and making far more use of PASE. The fact that so little use
is made of what we already had _before_ this OSS stuff came along
should have been a hint to IBM.
So what are you proposing IBM should do? Make all this new open source
stuff fit in to GO LICPGM? Or do you just need a Rosetta Stone of sorts?
--
This is the IBMi Open Source Roundtable (OpenSource) mailing list
To post a message email: OpenSource@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/opensource
or email: OpenSource-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/opensource.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.