RE: Why vote if you have no rights?

["Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Go ask a librarian if you know any and see if people with dark sunglasses
> have been there asking to see records of what books people have read and
> what
> internet sites have been visited.   They won't tell you , They can't tell
> the police,
> they can't even talk to their congressmen about it.  That's how
> it is RIGHT
> now.

Oh I love this.  Ask a librarian if guys in dark glasses have been there.
They will say, "No."  That proves it.


> I know a couple of librarians personally,  I can verify it.  There was a
> story also on NPR about it.

Bullcrap.  I looked for this.  Nothing anywhere on the internet or on NPR.
Post a reference.  Your personal verification is a little less than adequate
at this point.



> I would imagine if you looked thru the patriot act with the same
> glasses as
> Ashcroft You would not see any thing wrong(as you so stated.).

What the ... what did this even mean?  Rather than babbling, would you
please respond to my post?  How do you explain the differences in the quoted
version of PATRIOT 1 and the obvious misquotes of your email?  Or the
similar differences between the quoted version of your own supposedly leaked
document and the similar misquotes in your email?  There were huge
differences, and of course as all fanatics do, you ignore them.


> I can hear the words out of your mouth now.
>
> "If you haven't done any thing wrong,  why would you worry?"
> They are not coming for US their coming for the "Terrorist's"
>
> Let me rephrase that using 50year old terminology,
> "Their not coming for US, we're Catholics"

You are starting to REALLY offend me.  This is just ludicrous.  You are
somehow comparing me to NAZI APOLOGISTS?  Because I am reading words and you
are spouting nonsense?  I am Polish, many of my people gave their LIVES
helping the Jews escape the pogroms, and you DARE to somehow equate your
insane conspiracy theories with the realities of Kristalnacht?  You, sir,
are treading a VERY, VERY thin line.

Since it's obvious that you're quite convinced of your own theories,
regardless of fact, then I must insist on verifiable data or bow out of the
conversation.  If you cannot respond to my actual questions - for example,
to explain the complete disagreement of your email and the published (or
even unpublished) documents, then leave me out of it.  My blood pressure is
already high enough, and now I've wasted four hours.

Joe