|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] - > Sounds like you're still running OS/2. :-) I wish. But that's a dead horse, so... >XP is better than 3.1, 95, 95 OSR2, 98, 98SE, NT 4. I know, >not saying much. It's also prettier than Win2k. :-) Everything I've read indicates that if Win98SE is working well for you, you have no compelling reason to upgrade to XP. 98SE is where I'll be for a long time. Just to clarify my position, the main problem I have with XP is the hardware registration and the "phone home" crap. I happen to fiddle with my hardware quite a bit, and I refuse to accept that I have to call anyone to "please let me have my OS back, I added a new hard drive, and changed the video card." That is PURE BS! >What peeves me is needing a new version of Norton AntiVirus, >Adaptec EZ CD Creator, etc because the crippled function provided >in XP isn't compatible (or, more likely, collusion with the utility >software makers to force otherwise unnecessary upgrades). I dunno. Personally, I think this is ALL MicroShaft's doing. The OS *is*, after all, a significant departure from the DOS underpinnings of all Win9x OS's. Dan Bale IT - AS/400 Handleman Company 248-362-4400 Ext. 4952 D.Bale@Handleman.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.