× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



No, there are no differences on the IBM i side. I am changing the Windows
server. Both the old and new Windows servers are currently active and both
Windows servers are connecting to the same IBM i, but the old server is
fast, and the new server is slow.

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:32 PM Diego E. KESSELMAN <diegokesselman@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Hi Mark,

I should point to the DNS values (see below), but let me send you a
short checklist:

Have you changed anything on the connection string?
Have you checked the TCP buffers? (CHGTCPA) Suggestion: +1MB (1048576 on
both receive and send buffer)
Do you have different DNS value?
- Suggestion: Local DNS IP address or *NONE, *LOCAL, FQDN and
hostname entry on your host table.
Are you upgrading from a release previous to V7R2? Sometimes SQE makes
strange things and we need to change the QAQQINI to keep the old behavior.
Have you installed Db2 Symmetric Multiprocessing? Have you activated
this feature?
Have you changed your memory pools ?

Good luck!

--
Regards
Diego E. KESSELMAN



En 22/06/23 15:05, Mark Murphy escribió:
As far as I can tell, the new server is noticeably faster than the old
server, except for the JDBC connection. I expect this because the new
server is a 4 socket 2.9Ghz Xeon with 64Gb of RAM while the old server
is a
1 socket 2.0Ghz Xeon with 32Gb RAM. What I don't expect is the slowness
of
the writes to IBM i

The new server is using a hotspot JVM vs the OpenJ9 JVM on the old
server.
That shouldnt make that much difference should it? The JDBC driver is the
same on both. jtOpen 9.8.

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 4:54 PM Richard Schoen <
richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Make sure the new server is running at gigabit speed.

Virus scanning/ransomware detection ?

32/64 bit Windows JVM ?

Install something like DBeaver and run some queries.

Just a few thoughts.

Regards,
Richard Schoen
Web: http://www.richardschoen.net
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

------------------------------

message: 3
date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 15:25:21 -0400
from: Mark Murphy <jmarkmurphy@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Slow JDBC connection from remote server

IBM i v7.2

I am experiencing some strange JDBC issues that frankly have me
baffled. I
am using Talend Open Studio to do some ETL with IBM i as the load
target.
It all runs with acceptable speed. I am getting a rate of over 1000 rows
per second, but the server we are using to run the jobs is a bit
limited,
and development speed is a little slow.

So we just got a new server to do the Talend development and execution
on.
It is a beastly server with plenty of cores, threads, RAM and disk
space.
In fact it is much faster than the previous server. Except that now I am
only getting an insert rate of 10-20 rows per second on IBM i. Same
driver,
same IBM i, same user profile. All three servers are on the same network
segment in the datacenter. The new Talend server is Running Windows 2022
Datacenter, the old Talend server is running Windows Server 2016
Datacenter. I am using the same JDBC driver on both servers, and running
the same JVM on both servers. The connection is using the same set of
JDBC
jobs on IBM i. Why would one connection be 2 orders of magnitude slower
than the other?

Does anyone have any ideas how to troubleshoot this? Or know of any
tools
that I can use to determine what the issue might be? Or any
configurations
that I might look at? I have already checked the driver options, and
they
are identical.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription
related
questions.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.