Re: Job scheduler question -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Job scheduler question
From: Marc Rauzier <marc.rauzier@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 21:05:57 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Le 12/05/2022 à 20:08, Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis a écrit :

I could be wrong here but what is the objection with making the job a 'CALL xx' where XX is a CL Program? Thus you can modify the steps taken and commands run as needed, and nothing in the scheduler needs to be changed.

Just askin.....

That's true. Just a different way to work :-). Check my reply to Jim O post.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.