×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Performance of a view, once created, should not be affected by whether created from SQL or DDS definitions. (Unless you are creating the LF/View at execution time?)
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patrik Schindler
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 8:56 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [DDS] [V4] Select/omit woes
Hello Paul,
Am 14.06.2021 um 14:35 schrieb Paul Therrien <paultherrien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
1. Are the fields in the PF described with ALWNULL?
Good point! No. They are not supposed to be NULL, in neither table.
I guess, converting the SQL to DDS made me somehow blind. :-) Thanks for pointing out!
Of course I need to to a check of MODEL, RAM & FLASH fields against the other table if entries are the same or not.
2. I don't know why a view created with SQL would be any slower than a view created with DDS.
Because you're very likely not doing SQL on a 150. :-)
:wq! PoC
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link:
https://amazon.midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.