× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 5/3/2020 2:04 PM, John Yeung wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 2:07 PM Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
USING does the same thing += does: it makes it harder to make a mistake.
I guess you *could* think of `+=` as a way to avoid repeating yourself
syntactically, but in many languages, there's actually a semantic
difference (the left-hand term is not re-evaluated for augmented
assignment). Moreover, in the cases where there is no semantic
difference, then you can switch between the two forms freely. Neither
one is "more applicable" than the other.

There's no "could" about it.  += helps one avoid misspellings, especially when field names are similar.

Seriously, John.  I think sometimes you argue just to argue. It's ... offputting.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.