|
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 12:34 PM Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've run into variations of this issue alot over the years. The problemMe too. I kind of gave up trying to learn when I could and couldn't
is that the fields in the USING clause don't always work in a way that
is convenient.
use USING, and just never absorbed it into my (very small) SQL
repertoire. All my joins just use ON, which I find much more
predictable and reliable.
Am I missing out on some significant advantage that USING confers?
From where I'm sitting, it's just a finicky bit of limited-use syntax
sugar for ON anyway.
John Y.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.