RE: AS/400 vs. IBM i -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: AS/400 vs. IBM i
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:53:57 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

<snip>

Yes, maybe. But IBM failed. Why? Maybe they should hire more young marketeers than lawyers who force us to do a F14-orgy at every install? ;-)

</snip>

Or waste all our time on PTF cover letters leaving newer people confused if this PTF has real damage capability when the lingo at the top is just from back when IBM was having their war with Fast/400.
I submitted a RFE that it's time to get rid of this. They considered it but it got Declined.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.