× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. January 2019

RE: List of objects not saved with SWA while locked.

When saving a single object to show that SWA does, in fact, skip objects I
don't think that SAVACT(*SYSDFN) SAVACTWAIT(10) is anything to fear. A
longer time would not help as the process holding that lock only ends in
restricted state. And, since it is a single object I really don't need it
to be in sync with anything else.

We don't use Mimix anymore. We dropped them when they decided they no
longer need to participate with IBM's early ship program and can wait
months and months after a new release of the OS comes out before they
support it. We don't put up with crap. I believe they told me not only
would it be months until they supported base 7.3 but the UOM before they
supported temporal tables was going to have to be bigger than months. They
changed that tune when people started leaving them in droves. Remember
all the HA ad's with "we support temporal tables"?

We do not use a SAN with any of our Power equipment.


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.