Re: Issues with Adopted Authority -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Issues with Adopted Authority
From: Marc Rauzier <marc.rauzier@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 21:03:19 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Le 29/05/2018 à 16:52, Joe Hatchell a écrit :

The call stack is
lost and therefore they have no authority to the objects needed to run the
program.

I solved a similar issue by writing a program which is invoked in the routing entry of the batch subsystem in place of QSYS/QCMD program.
The program I wrote does adopt owner authority. In fact, it is a bit more complex but this is the principle.

Marc

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Issues with Adopted Authority , DrFranken

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.